January
11, 2013
Sometime back, I was
meeting a group of friends when something came up and one of them said, “What Bernie Madoff did was awful.”
Honestly, I had never even heard of him before that day, let alone know what
awful thing he had done. I don’t think anyone judged me for not having heard of
him, but myself. When I came back and looked him up, I could only wonder why I hadn’t
heard of him before. In fact, I didn’t even know how his name is spelled, and I
struggled to look up the right person on the net. And then Wikipedia showed me
the light.
Ever since, I have made
it a point to ensure that I don’t look stupid in front of people. Sure, it is
not possible for someone to know it all, but it is criminal not to stay abreast
of the current affairs. Never again have I told anyone that I don’t like
reading the news. It’s more important to know something about everything than
know everything about something.
The problem is, I never
grew up being encouraged to read news. My father religiously kept himself
updated on the ongoing of the world and was stereotyped as “that guy who never shares the newspaper and spends hours reading it.”
My mother on the other hand would scour the paper to look for information on
movies, cookery, and fashion. And I heard this a lot from others, “I don’t even read the newspaper these days,
the current state of the world depresses me.” However, how do you hang out
with a group of smart, intelligent people when you cannot make a decent
conversation with them? My evolution in this case was certainly need-based.
It is not just
important to know it all, it is also important to have an opinion about things.
Of course this comes with time and practice. But when there is so much to read about,
how does one filter things? My areas of interest include literature, Bollywood,
science, photography, scrabble, and solving puzzles, in no particular order. However,
knowing a lot about your interest area is not enough, especially if you are
targeting to launch yourself in the job market. You need to be able to make
conversation with a wider audience. You might meet a group of people talking
about Chanel perfumes, Bofors scandal, gun legislation, avocado salad recipes, and
Pulitzer prize winners in the same room. How do you mingle with everyone if you
do not know a little bit of everything?
So I make sure that I at
least skim through the news headlines daily. Washington Post, Huffington Post,
Drudge Report, The Chronicles of Higher Education, are some of the usual
suspects. Then there is merit in knowing the best places in town to dine, wine,
or go around (Yelp helps me with that). My adviser has an interesting theory
about skimming through large chunks of information, he compares it to eating a
bowl of rice. You need not chew your way through every morsel, every grain. It is
enough to do some basic chewing. I really like his analogy.
So never shy away from
knowing the world around you, because everything will affect you, directly or
indirectly. Pay attention to what people are talking about, in cocktail
parties, on Facebook, etc. And make Wikipedia your best friend. With all those
resources the internet provides, there is no excuse, absolutely no excuse for
being ignorant.
sunshine
3 comments:
I would also suggest reading WSJ and NYT. Both offers information and opinion. One is pro market and other is pro government. It is as if you are arriving at same results but each will have a different theory on how the results were arrived at. It is fun once you know where they are coming from.
I also assume you are watching the daily show and colbert nation. If not, highly recommend you do it!
Badri, thanks for these recommendations :)
I would never have thought that you are not abreast of the news!
Anyway, two thumbs up to the above commentator. WSJ and NYT are two very traditional and respected news organization. But you must be clear: WSJ's parent company is News Corp, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Why is this of significance? Because News Corp also owns Fox News. Which basically means WSJ is a right leaning news outlet; NYT on the other hand is overtly left leaning. (Both "right" and "left" in this context is obviously intrinsic to the US.) It is always good to know "both" sides of the same story.
The Daily Show, hosted by John Stewart and the The Colbert Report, hosted by Stephen Colbert (who incidentally used to work for Stewart some years ago) are satires/topical/political programs on Comedy Central. Both are very left leaning. Both are my staple every week night. [I'm very left leaning. Again, by US standards]. Both are very informational and entertaining.
What I've observed is, it is best to get the news from the most neutral reporting agencies. Reuters, CNN, BBC are the ones I've found to be mostly neutral.
Wikipedia is a good place to start, but often time if you want to know to dig deep, it doesn't provide the answers, or provides answers which cannot be accurately verified.
Oh, and to not know about the biggest Ponzi-schemer in entire history of mankind, well, that is criminal!
~ Krishanu
Post a Comment